A writer friend who is attempting her first historical
fiction novel recently asked what to do with bland writing. I was hard pressed
to answer because it’s something I recognize when I see it and feel it when I
write it (stomach flutters and discontent). She’s undertaking a very difficult thing: creating fiction from a factual
account. When I first tackled the genre
of historical fiction, it was hard for me to deviate from the “real” events
which were so gripping in themselves, and shape them into a living, breathing
narrative. It took some searching for the story in the material especially when
I wanted to remain loyal to, and maintain the integrity of, the actual events.
Not all historical fiction books do this or need to do this,
but it’s different if you set out to tell a real story and fictionalize it than
if you set out with a fictional story set in a specific historic time and place. Both require accuracy of
details, but I think fictionalizing fact is much harder than adding accurate
historic detail to a story that deviates from a set timeline.
And believe me, I've been there. A memorable example was during my first draft
of Nothing Here But Stones when I suffered through the first 2/3 of the draft (bland bland bland) before stumbling on the suggestion of changing my
tense from third person to first. For this
book, it was Key. I scrapped the whole
draft and started over in first person. This one “simple”(?) change provided an immediacy
for the story that had been sorely lacking.
It also helped me to form a more personal relationship with the
viewpoint character and helped me through the multiple revisions to
come.
After sharing this story with my friend, I still wasn’t sure
if I’d given her anything to grab onto. What is the fix? As I
was thinking this over, I was reminded of my work teaching fifth graders. In the classroom, I was constantly trying to find ways to make the abstract concrete. Each
piece of writing varied, so there wasn't just one fix; there were many possibilities. But thinking about
blandness, especially for fictional stories, two strategies popped into my mind: Snapshots and Thoughtshots.
These terms were stolen from Barry Lane in his wonderful
teacher resource on Revision, After the
End. If you’re a teacher, this
book is chock-full of revision ideas.
The “Snapshot” concept is pretty simple to get across to
students: Imagine you’re inside a
photograph (or a movie). What are the
visual, concrete, physical things in the picture? For kids, you explain this as the setting or
where the characters are at the moment. It’s basic description as we know it.
Thoughtshots are a little harder to explain because to use
them requires a deeper leap into character. When you’re writing, it takes a pause
and sometimes a full stop to analyze what is going on internally. What is my character thinking right now?
What is affecting him/her at an emotional level? What does the character wish for that he/she
does not have? How is what's going on right now affecting him/her?
Try the cat on the right: "That guy next to me is on such an ego trip." |
Thoughtshots require a different type of imagining: imagining your way into someone else’s
mind. In this case the character(s) in
your story.
With this said, it’s the balance between Snapshots and
Thoughshots that’s important. Setting
and description are important for engaging the reader in the details needed to
bring the story to life. But spending
too much time standing at the photographic overlook can detour a reader away
from the main purpose of the expedition.
Readers want to fully experience the trip. And the way they experience it is through the
hearts and souls of the characters on the page--most often through the one
viewpoint character you want them to care about the most.
One way to make the journey more enjoyable is to
blend and balance the outer world with the inner.Too much of either one will put readers to
sleep, or start them dialing the telephone number for character psychiatric care.
At the end of their travels, a reader should be able to do
more than give a list of motels and restaurants. Readers
want the full experience—one that will linger and resonate on an emotional level long after they've reached their destination.
No comments:
Post a Comment